Part 2
Courtesy the
NOAA

"With the development of the haddock fillet, beginning about 1921
or 1922, this product has become more and more popular, and the haddock
has been exploited so rapidly that its production more than doubled in
three or four years... It became apparent that this exploitation of haddock
could not increase indefinitely. Indeed we are already approaching the
limit of this fish. What, then, is to follow?" Harden F. Taylor
Fishing Gazette - 1931
Along with the switch from schooners to trawlers, the targets
of the fishery changes as well. Developments in cold storage, marketing
and distribution allowed for the use of fresh fish in areas far
from the fishing ports. Rather than salt cod, the industry switched
to haddock. The development of the fish fillet, and practical methods
for freezing and storage of frozen fish meant that Americans in the
interior could now get products not heretofore available. Landings
of haddock shot up rapidly, as demand grew. This period witnesses
the development of the fresh fish industry, and the consequences
of the shift in target species to the utilization of the groundfish
resource.
Period 3. Fishing Troubles (1930-1960)

"It
is only in the last few years when the fishing fleet has suffered
from a marked scarcity of haddock that the folly of (the) belief
in the inexhaustibility of nature has become potent". William Herrington
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1932
The sudden rise in popularity of haddock resulted in early signs
of stress in the population, and landings plummeted. Scientists
were asked to study causes of the drop in landings, and to recommend
conservation measures. In reaction to changes in stock size, the
fleet moved into waters off Canada (as the salt cod industry had
in earlier years). Biologists of the day recommended increasing net
mesh sizes, but no formal agreement was forthcoming. Profitability
of the fishing industry declined significantly through the Great
Depression. Later in this era, the outbreak of WW II resulted in
prosperity as war-time protein demands and a shortage of large fishing
vessels that were conscripted for military activities. After the
war, lower demand and more vessels resulted in very low profitability.
The rise and fall of the redfish industry is a classic story
of the consequences of unrestrained development of a nonsustainable
fishery.
Period 4. Distant Water Fleets (DWFs) (1960-1976)

"...try to imagine a mobile and completely self-contained timber-
cutting machine that could smash through the roughest trails of the forest,
cut down trees, mill them, and deliver consumer-ready lumber in half
the time of normal logging and milling operations. This was exactly what
factory trawlers did -- this was exactly their effect on fish -- in the
forests of the deep. It could not long go unnoticed". Distant Water
William Warner
The presence of distant water fleets off the coast of the USA was
universally denounced by the domestic industry -- perhaps one of the
few issues on which consensus was ever achieved. Declining fish stocks,
and lower domestic landings resulted first in an agreement within ICNAF
to reduce foreign catches, and finally to the passage of the Magnuson
Act, which gave the U.S. jurisdiction in waters out to 200 miles. The
industry supported research showing the harmful effects of overexploitation,
particularly to support our negotiating position in ICNAF. At this time
both the U.S. and Canadian fishing industries and scientists were united
against the non-North American factions to protect the coastal states'
interests. But the Magnuson Act contained provisions more sweeping than
just curtailing international fishing, it also stipulated for the first
time that U.S. fisheries would be managed for maximum benefits to society.
Period 5. The 2nd Industrial Revolution (1977-1984)

"No one knew exactly how many newcomers had arrived during the
last four months of 1977, but according to one report, new boats entered
the fishery at the astounding rate of about one every four days".
Industry in Trouble Margret Dewar
Following passage of Magnuson, there was great optimism in the
fishing industry. Since the international fleets were gone, there
must be large underfished resources now available to U.S. fishermen.
New, more modern vessels were constructed, some using financing available
at low rates through existing government loan programs. The Canadians
also had extended their territorial jurisdiction 200 miles seaward,
excluding U.S. vessels which had fished off the Scotian Shelf and
the southern Grand Banks for generations. Moreover, overlapping territorial
claims in the Georges Bank region between the U.S. and Canada resulted
in high-level diplomatic negotiations. In 1979 a draft treaty on
reciprocal fishing rights was agreed to at the ministerial level.
The treaty recognized historical fisheries by the U.S. off Canada,
and vice-versa. However, with the change in administrations in 1980,
and opposition from some segments of the industry, the draft treaty
was not ratified. Ultimately, the boundary between the U.S. and Canada
was settled in the United Nations' World Court. Americans were forever
barred from fishing areas off Canada, and areas in the northern part
of Georges Bank, where so much of the haddock landings of the 1920s-1950s
had been taken. This negotiation has since precluded either side
from adjusting effort on transboundary stocks in a complementary
way.
Period 6. Too Many Fishermen... Chasing too Few Fish (1985-1995)

"If John Cabot were alive today, he would not recognize Georges
Bank. Instead of a sea swarming with majestic cod, he would find dogfish.
Instead of flounder, he would find skates. Instead of a fishermen's dream,
he would find a nightmare". Congressman Gerry Studds 1991
Fleet effort built up quickly from 1977-1985, and has remained
at a stable and high level ever since. Quota management systems,
a hold-over from the ICNAF days were abandoned in 1982, replaced
by what proved to be ineffective controls on net mesh size, closed
areas and minimum fish sizes in landings. One by one, many of the
most productive stocks have collapsed in the wake of ever-advancing
harvesting technology, and failure of the management system to take
steps necessary to rebuild the populations. Landings tumbled, and
fish prices soared, fueled by scarce catches and increasing demand
by health-conscious consumers. Finally, environmental groups sued
the federal government, claiming that the Commerce Department didn't
enforce its own rules mandating that overfishing of resources should
not be allowed to occur. This set in motion sweeping new management
plans intended not only to control fishing effort, but also to
rebuild groundfish stocks. Government financial aid has been forthcoming
to buffer the impacts of new rules on the industry, but it is likely
that there will be more calls for industry support while tough stock
recovery measures are given time to work.
Period 7. Lessons From Fish Schools

"While the facts before us show no proof or presumption of any
depletion of the fisheries on the banks frequented by American otter
trawlers, it is possible that the seeds of damage already have been sown
and their fruits may appear in the future or that the development of
a wholly unregulated fishery eventually may result in injury where none
now exists". 1914 Report of the U.S. Commissioner of Fisheries
Throughout the 20th century there several themes have emerged
from how the industry developed and how it was managed. The industry
has been in almost continuous change since 1900. Recent calls to
preserve the 'historical character' of the industry as new rules
are contemplated begs the question of legitimacy of which historical
patterns should be preserved. Throughout the century, various gear
sectors have been in conflict. At the turn of the century it was
sail vs. steam. Now, serious conflicts arise between large trawlers,
and inshore gill netters. The westward progression of the fishing,
first as the salt cod fishery abandoned the Grand Banks, and then
as the redfish fishery was excluded from Canadian waters following
extended jurisdiction is a clear trend. The list of stocks 'written-off'
and commercially extinct includes species such as halibut, redfish,
and--until recovery plans can work--haddock and yellowtail flounder.
The diversity and productivity of groundfish fishery has declined
because of the lack of concern for the species components of
the resource. Lastly, the failure of scientists, managers, industry,
and international partners to work cooperatively attests to the complexities
of maximizing economic gain while minimizing long-term damage to
the source of that gain. The history of this fishery and its problems
is in fact a parable for man's interactions with the natural world
in the 20th century.
History of the groundfishing industry of New England Part 1